<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is AVCHD useful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomorrowland.com/2008/10/22/is-avchd-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomorrowland.com/2008/10/22/is-avchd-useful/</link>
	<description>technology making our lives more futuristic and fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 23:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.tomorrowland.com/2008/10/22/is-avchd-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelsmith.tv/?p=48#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>I heard handbrake can convert .mts files -- but am not sure if it&#039;s command line interface-only ... ( ref: &lt;a href=&quot;http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:G4G8VwxryOIJ:forum.handbrake.fr/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D5%26t%3D9239+handbrake+mts&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=2&amp;gl=us&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:G4G8VwxryOIJ:...&lt;/a&gt; ) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard handbrake can convert .mts files &#8212; but am not sure if it&#039;s command line interface-only &#8230; ( ref: <a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:G4G8VwxryOIJ:forum.handbrake.fr/viewtopic.php%3Ff%3D5%26t%3D9239+handbrake+mts&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=2&amp;gl=us" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:G4G8VwxryOIJ:.." rel="nofollow">http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:G4G8VwxryOIJ:..</a>. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.tomorrowland.com/2008/10/22/is-avchd-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelsmith.tv/?p=48#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments David Sutherland.  I appreciate the input.

On the mac comment, I think I said &#039;professional editing&#039;, not &#039;commercial editing&#039;. By professional I mean Hollywood and/or the real entertainment industry.  Industrial and religious sectors do a lot of weird things in the name of trying to save a buck.  Using windows, premier, sony vegas, D-vision, etc falls in the &quot;what the hay?&quot; category and bores me.  Refer to my statement above where I say &quot;I don&#039;t care if you disagree.&quot;  Still, no matter what platform or handicapped unprofessional system you&#039;re using for editing, to have any quality in your master you&#039;re going to have to work in a higher quality than any flavor of h.264 or mpeg.  This means transcoding your AVCHD source into a higher quality editable codec.  Which even on a PC will take a while.  I&#039;ll report back later on how fast my 8-core does it.  If it&#039;s faster than real time - it&#039;s faster than capturing and we have our advantage.

On the VLC.. Thanks for that.  I actually did notice that VLC has a way to export, but it didn&#039;t look as easy as Voltaic.  I&#039;m curious about the quality of the scaler in Voltaic.  ProRes is 1920 and my MTS files are 1440 = horizontal scaling.  Like I said, Voltaic will export to ProRes.. I should check the speed on that too.  AIC might introduce some added processing.

MPEG STREAMCLIP would be nice. But those guys never return my emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments David Sutherland.  I appreciate the input.</p>
<p>On the mac comment, I think I said &#8216;professional editing&#8217;, not &#8216;commercial editing&#8217;. By professional I mean Hollywood and/or the real entertainment industry.  Industrial and religious sectors do a lot of weird things in the name of trying to save a buck.  Using windows, premier, sony vegas, D-vision, etc falls in the &#8220;what the hay?&#8221; category and bores me.  Refer to my statement above where I say &#8220;I don&#8217;t care if you disagree.&#8221;  Still, no matter what platform or handicapped unprofessional system you&#8217;re using for editing, to have any quality in your master you&#8217;re going to have to work in a higher quality than any flavor of h.264 or mpeg.  This means transcoding your AVCHD source into a higher quality editable codec.  Which even on a PC will take a while.  I&#8217;ll report back later on how fast my 8-core does it.  If it&#8217;s faster than real time &#8211; it&#8217;s faster than capturing and we have our advantage.</p>
<p>On the VLC.. Thanks for that.  I actually did notice that VLC has a way to export, but it didn&#8217;t look as easy as Voltaic.  I&#8217;m curious about the quality of the scaler in Voltaic.  ProRes is 1920 and my MTS files are 1440 = horizontal scaling.  Like I said, Voltaic will export to ProRes.. I should check the speed on that too.  AIC might introduce some added processing.</p>
<p>MPEG STREAMCLIP would be nice. But those guys never return my emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.tomorrowland.com/2008/10/22/is-avchd-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>david sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelsmith.tv/?p=48#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>good article, especially the observations at the end about the lost benefits of tapeless workflow when dealing with time consuming transcoding

I take exception with a couple points: commercial editing does not just happen on the Mac, it happens whenever someone makes a buck. I&#039;d be interestedd in hearing how Sony Vegas handles Sony .mts files.  I am dealing with exactly the same problem of using .mts files, but with an older version of FCP.

re: vlc launching and playback I was surprised at your open with... issues since I don&#039;t recall these.  The newer .92 (???) version of vlc handles .mts files a lot better than the .8xx (?) version but you should look harder at vlc since it is NOT just a playback tool.  Actually it can be used for transcoding but it isn&#039;t user friendly.  Under the open dialogs you&#039;ll find ways to pipe the output out to a file instead of just the screen and there you can find way to many (confusing) ways to save the output.

Also would love to find a great .mts to Apple Pro Res transcoder.  (time to lobby mpgstreamclip folks to add .mts to their import capability-???)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article, especially the observations at the end about the lost benefits of tapeless workflow when dealing with time consuming transcoding</p>
<p>I take exception with a couple points: commercial editing does not just happen on the Mac, it happens whenever someone makes a buck. I&#8217;d be interestedd in hearing how Sony Vegas handles Sony .mts files.  I am dealing with exactly the same problem of using .mts files, but with an older version of FCP.</p>
<p>re: vlc launching and playback I was surprised at your open with&#8230; issues since I don&#8217;t recall these.  The newer .92 (???) version of vlc handles .mts files a lot better than the .8xx (?) version but you should look harder at vlc since it is NOT just a playback tool.  Actually it can be used for transcoding but it isn&#8217;t user friendly.  Under the open dialogs you&#8217;ll find ways to pipe the output out to a file instead of just the screen and there you can find way to many (confusing) ways to save the output.</p>
<p>Also would love to find a great .mts to Apple Pro Res transcoder.  (time to lobby mpgstreamclip folks to add .mts to their import capability-???)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
